Public transport: One mode or several?
place - europe, place - urban, mode - bus, mode - subway/metro, mode - rail, economics - value of time, planning - methods, planning - travel demand management, ridership - behaviour, ridership - commuting, ridership - mode choice
Choice behaviour, Generalised travel cost, Unobserved preferences, Rail factor, Demand forecast, Value of travel time
This paper develops a methodology for testing and implementing differences in preferences for a set of public transport modes, relating to observed and unobserved attributes, in state-of-practice large-scale travel demand models. Results of a case study for commuters in the Stockholm public transport system suggest that there are preference differences among public transport modes. We found that the value of time for train is lower than for bus and metro, and that it is higher for auxiliary modes than for the main mode. Surprisingly, we found no evidence for differences proportional to the in-vehicle time between bus and metro, suggesting that characteristics of in-vehicle time in these two modes are valued equally by the travellers. Nevertheless, unobserved preference for metro is higher than the preference for bus. Regarding the existence of a rail factor, we find evidence to support the hypothesis that rail-based modes have in fact a smaller time parameter (train) or higher alternative specific constant (metro), indicating that rail modes are preferable to bus, ceteris paribus.
Permission to publish the abstract has been given by Elsevier, copyright remains with them.
Lorenzo Varela, J.M., Börjesson, M., & Daly, A. (2018). Public transport: One mode or several? Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 113, pp. 137-156.