Inequitable inefficiency: A case study of rail transit fare policies
Document Type
Journal Article
Publication Date
2025
Subject Area
place - north america, place - urban, mode - rail, economics - subsidy, policy - equity, policy - fares
Keywords
Transit, Equity, Fare policy, Transport subsidies, Transportation finance
Abstract
Transit fare equity research overwhelmingly measures equity based on disparity in the fare paid for travel without consideration of the costs of service delivery. Research also ignores the cost-sharing nature of transit—as more riders consume it, the average cost per rider declines. Together, this leaves an incomplete understanding about who receives more subsidy. This study measures equity by analyzing spatial and temporal cost recovery variability of two rail systems, BART in the San Francisco Bay Area and MARTA in Atlanta. I scale origin-destination trip cost recoveries to stations and operating time periods and find that travel associated with outlying areas and off-peak times receive more subsidy. I further find that subsidy patterns are marginally progressive; they positively correlate with select disadvantaged socioeconomic groups. I offer ideas on why these findings appear divergent from past research.
Rights
Copyright (c) 2025 Zakhary Mallett. All contents licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-by NC-ND 4.0 International license. Journal of Transport and Land Use
Recommended Citation
Mallett, Z. (2025). Inequitable inefficiency: A case study of rail transit fare policies. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 18(1), 319–358.
